Was The Times cowardly
and lacking in journalistic solidarity when it decided not to publish
the images from the French satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo that
precipitated the execution of French journalists?
Some readers I’ve
heard from certainly think so. Evan Levine of New York City wrote: “I
just wanted to register my extreme disappointment at what can only be
described as a dereliction of leadership and responsibility by the New
York Times in deciding not to publish the Charlie Hebdo cartoons after
today’s massacre.”
Todd Stuart of Key
West, Fla., expressed the same view: “I hope the public editor looks
into the incredibly cowardly decision of the NYT not to publish the
Charlie Hebdo cartoons. I can’t think of anything more important than
major papers like the NYT standing up for the most basic principles of
freedom.”
And many outside commenters and press critics agreed. Jeff Jarvis of City University of New York wrote:
“If you’re the paper of record, if you’re the highest exemplar of
American journalism, if you expect others to stand by your journalists
when they are threatened, if you respect your audience to make up its
own mind, then dammit stand by Charlie Hebdo and inform your public. Run
the cartoons.”
A Editorial article of The New york times famous News paper
No comments:
Post a Comment
thanks for comment... your suggestions are valuable and we try to accept.welcome again.